检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]牡丹江医学院附属二院,黑龙江牡丹江157000
出 处:《中医临床研究》2017年第9期117-118,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:评价血管内介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗脑动脉瘤的效果。方法:2012年7月-2016年4月我院收治脑动脉瘤115例。其中73例行血管内介入栓塞术治疗,设为研究组。另42例行开颅夹闭术治疗,设为参照组。分析两组的治疗情况及疗效。结果:研究组治愈率94.5%,高于参照组治愈率61.9%(P<0.05)。研究组总有效率100.0%,高于参照组总有效率78.6%(P<0.05)。研究组并发症发生率16.4%,高于参照组并发症发生率40.5%(P<0.05)。结论:脑动脉瘤的治疗术式中,血管内介入栓塞术疗效优于开颅夹闭术,且并发症较少。Objective:To evaluate the effect of intravascular interventional embolization combined with craniotomy on the treatment of cerebral aneurysm.Methods:115cases of cerebral aneurysms were selected,73cases of them undergoing intravascular interventional embolization was set as the research group.The other42cases who received routine craniotomy clipping treatment were set as the control group.The treatment and efficiency of two groups were analyzed.Results:The efficacy of the research group was94.5%,which was higher than that of the control group,61.9%(P<0.05).The total efficiency of the research group was100.0%,which was higher than that of the control group,78.6%(P<0.05).The incidence of complications of the research group was16.4%,which was lower than that of the control group,40.5%(P<0.05).Conclusions:In the treatment of cerebral aneurysm,the efficacy of endovascular interventional embolization was vbetter than the clipping craniotomy with less complications.
分 类 号:R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145