检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张许新 钱维建[1] 马燕君[1] ZHANG Xu-xin;QIAN Wei-jian;MA Yan-jun(Hospital Affiliated of Nantong University,Nantong 226000,Jiangsu)
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2017年第3期69-70,72,共3页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者实施协同护理配合延续性护理的可行性。方法:选择收治的77例COPD患者为研究对象,通过随机数字表法分为观察组40例,对照组37例,对照组患者接受协同护理,观察组在对照组基础上应用延续性护理,观察两组患者干预前后自护能力及生活质量评分。结果:干预前两组患者自护能力及生活质量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后观察组患者自护能力及生产质量评分同对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:协同护理配合延续性护理能有效增强COPD患者自护能力,提高其生活质量,值得推广。Objective:To explore the feasibility of collaborative nursing and continuous nursing in patients withCOPD.Methods:77cases of COPD patients,by randomly divided into the observation group40cases,control group37,control group patients received collaborative care,the observation group in the control group on the basis of theapplication of continuous nursing,observe two groups of patients before and after nursing to self-care and quality oflife score.Results:two groups of patients self-care ability and quality of life before the intervention had no significantdifference(P>0.05);the observation group after the intervention patients self-care ability and quality scorecompared with the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:collaborativenursing continuing nursing care can effectively enhance the self-care ability of patients with COPD,improve thequality of life,worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15