论公安机关办理吸毒案件“到案经过”若干问题  

On Several Issues concerning “The Suspect's Capture Process” in the Drug Cases Dealt by Public Security Organs

作　　者：李蓉[1] LI Rong

机构地区：[1]安徽公安职业学院治安管理训练部

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2017年第3期30-35,共6页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：2016安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目"大型群众性活动风险评估"(SK2016A0186)的研究成果

摘　　要：公安机关查处涉嫌吸毒违法嫌疑人的过程常常体现了强制传唤、继续盘问等强制措施适用的过程,这一过程在卷宗中通过"到案经过"予以体现。"到案经过"的模糊性以及与实际执法过程的错位,既有执法本身的因素,但更多源于立法本身的模糊性。"到案经过"作为一种过程证据,可以直接证明公安机关的侦查以及调查行为过程的合法性,对其他案件事实也有印证作用。因此,应修正"到案经过"实际运用中的问题,避免立法与执法的错位,发挥其证明作用。Criminal coercive measures,such as mandatory summons,continuous interrogation,are applied inthe investigation process of drug cases and such process is displayed as“the suspect’s capture process”in thefiles.The fuzziness of the suspect’s capture process,which is dislocated from actual law enforcement process,is rooted in the ambiguity of the legislation itself rather than law enforcement process.As a process evidence,the suspect’s capture process can directly prove the legality of the investigation of the public security organsand the investigation of the process of conduct,which can also prove the facts of other cases.So,the practicalapplication problem of“the suspect’s capture process”should be corrected so as to avoid the dislocation oflegislation.

关 键 词：到案经过 过程证据 强制传唤 盘查权 

分 类 号：D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]