资源禀赋、资产性收益与产业扶贫——多案例比较研究  

Resources endowment, asset returns and industry poverty alleviation: A comparative study on many cases

作　　者：梁琦[1] 蔡建刚[1,2] LIANG Qi;CAI Jiangang(School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;Poverty Alleviation and Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学管理学院,广东广州510275 [2]吉首大学旅游与管理工程学院,湖南吉首416000

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期85-92,共8页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金应急管理项目"中国扶贫开放战略和政策的评估与优化"(71541042);教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金博导类项目"产业转移的资源空间配置效应--基于企业视角的考察"(20130171110043)

摘　　要：确保贫困户的资产性收益是提升产业扶贫绩效的重要举措。通过构建一个包含产业类型、投资者类型和贫困户在内的理论框架,采用多案例研究的方法,对比研究产业扶贫的实施逻辑和要点。研究表明:贫困地区的资源禀赋型产业比市场需求型产业具有更高的扶贫绩效,内部投资者比外部投资者更具有脱贫减贫的倾向,而资产性收益的不同支付方式会产生较大的效用差异。对此,贫困地区政府首先要以资源禀赋为基础选择产业项目,其次要确保政府资金的合理应用,最后要营造良好的产业发展环境,从而提升产业扶贫实效。Ensuring assets returns of the poor is an important measure to promote performance for poverty alleviation.By building a theoretical framework which includes industrial types,investor types and the poor,and by adopting the method of multi-case study,the present essay undertakes a comparative study of the logic and key points of implementing poverty alleviation.Research shows that the industry of resources endowment has a higher performance than the industry of market-driven in poor areas,that internal investors have a tendency to escape poverty reduction compared with outside investors,and that the different payment methods of asset returns will produce a large differences of utilities.So,the government in poor regions should first select industries based on the resources endowment,then ensure the proper use of government funds,and finally create a good environment for industrial development so as to promote effectiveness of poverty alleviation.

关 键 词：资源禀赋 资产性收益 产业扶贫 多案例研究 

分 类 号：F323.8[经济管理—产业经济]