检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王琦[1] 冷琦琦 Wang Qi;Leng Qiqi(Department of Respiratory Medicine,the Central Hospital of Suizhou City,441300;Zengdu Hospital of Suizhou City,441300)
机构地区:[1]随州市中心医院呼吸内科,441300 [2]随州市曾都医院,441300
出 处:《中国社区医师》2017年第22期30-31,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨噻托溴铵不同给药方式治疗哮喘合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效。方法:收治哮喘合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者65例,分为对照组和观察组,采用噻托溴铵不同给药方式治疗,比较治疗效果。结果:两组不良反应发生率、症状消失时间和住院费用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:噻托溴铵不同给药方式治疗哮喘合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病的效果好,不同给药方式在治疗效果方面差异无统计学意义,能缩短患者住院时间和病程,显著提升患者生活质量。Objective:To explore the efficacy of tiotropium bromide with different ways of administration in the treatment ofasthma complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Methods:65patients with asthma complicated with chronicobstructive pulmonary disease were selected,they were divided into the control group and the observation group,the two groupswere treated with tiotropium bromide with different ways of administration,and we compared the efficacy of treatment.Results:Theincidence of adverse reactions,symptom disappearance time and hospitalization expenses of the two groups were not statisticallysignificant(P>0.05).Conclusion:The efficacy of tiotropium bromide with different ways of administration in the treatment ofasthma complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was significant,there was no significant difference in the effect ofdifferent administration methods,it can shorten the hospitalization time and course of patients,and significantly improve thequality of life of patients.
关 键 词:噻托溴铵不同给药方式 哮喘 慢性阻塞性肺疾病
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117