生计资产异质性视角下浙江农户宅基地流转后的福利评价与比较  

The Welfare Evaluation and Comparison of the Peasant Households with Heterogeneity of Livelihood Assets after Rural Residential Land Conversion in Zhejiang

作　　者：徐建军[1] XU Jian-jun(College of Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211,China)

机构地区：[1]宁波大学科学技术学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《宁波大学学报（人文科学版）》2017年第5期110-116,共7页Journal of Ningbo University：Liberal Arts Edition

基　　金：浙江省科技厅软科学研究计划项目"宅基地流转过程中农户的风险评价;福利变化及补偿机制设计:以浙江为例"(2016C35001);宁波大学科研基金项目"垄断竞争框架下浙江进口贸易利得的微观考察"(XYW15005);宁波大学科学技术学院科研项目"金融支持战略性新兴产业发展研究"(YKY17012)

摘　　要：以浙江宁波、绍兴、嘉兴、湖州等地农户为调查对象,依据农户生计资产分类,就农户宅基地流转后的福利水平进行模糊评价。整体来看,农户经济、居住条件、休闲健康方面的福利水平高于设定的宅基地流转前农户福利的模糊状态,而社会保障、生态环境、发展机会以及心理认同四方面的福利水平在宅基地流转后反而下降了。基于生计资产异质性农户的比较发现,农户经济、居住条件方面均提高了生计资产缺乏型和富裕型农户的福利水平,但降低了这两类农户的社会保障和生态环境方面的福利;不同之处在于,宅基地流转还促进了资产缺乏型农户的休闲健康、发展机遇方面的福利,但降低了其心理认同度,这与宅基地流转对生计资产富裕型农户的影响正好相反。Taking the farmers in Ningbo,Shaoxing,Jiaxing and Huzhou as the survey objects,the paper conducts a fuzzy evaluation of the welfareof farmers'homestead transferred by classifying the farmers according to their livelihood assets.On the whole,the welfare level of farmer's economy,living condition,leisure andhealth is higher than that of the home welfare before rural residential land conversion,while the benefits level such as social security,ecological environment,development opportunity and psychological identity has not been improved after the transfer of homesteads.The comparison of the heterogeneouslivelihood assets shows that the farmer's economy and living conditions have improved the welfare level of the assets-lack and the assets-rich of farmers,but reduced the social security and ecological environment.The difference is that the homestead transfer has also promoted the leisure and health,and development opportunities of the farmers who lack the assets,but reduced their psychological identity,which is opposite to the impact of homestead circulation on the assets-rich peasant households.

关 键 词：宅基地流转 生计资产 农户福利 模糊评价法 

分 类 号：F301.2[经济管理—产业经济]