检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:桂起权[1] 林田 Qiquan Gui;Tian Lin(School of Philosophy, Wuhan University;College of Law and Politics, Inner-Mongolia Normal University)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学哲学系 [2]内蒙古师范大学法政学院
出 处:《逻辑学研究》2017年第3期22-34,共13页Studies in Logic
摘 要:长期以来,中国逻辑学界围绕"辩证逻辑"的主要争议是这一逻辑是否可能存在。这种仅仅围绕基本概念的讨论因缺乏共识而难以为继,在现代逻辑的研究范式冲击下逐渐消亡。本文试图为读者展现一种近年来为学界逐渐接受的更加务实的方法。这种方法旨在考虑形式逻辑表达哲学上的"辩证"概念,并将其视为逻辑系统正当性的来源。这一进路促使国内不同领域的学者们先后提出了多种相互竞争的辩证逻辑。进一步,尽管对辩证这一概念的理想翻译可能是不存在的,但我们没有理由将这样一种尚在探索的逻辑排除在逻辑家族之外。For a long period of time the debate over the concept of“dialectical logic”in Chinahad been largely dogmatic,focused on whether such type of logic was even possible.Due tothe development of modern logic,topics on dialectical logic had become archaic over the yearsuntil the adoption of a more pragmatic approach aimed at formalizing the philosophical conceptof“dialectic”in formal logic.This new approach led to several competing formal theoriesof dialectic logic proposed by some Chinese scholars.Furthermore,it becomes clearer thatalthough a perfect translation of“dialectic”seems impossible,there is still no reason to denydisalectical logic as a member of formal logics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.10.88