论证实践与中国逻辑史研究  

Argumentative Practices and Research on the History of Chinese Logic

作　　者：何杨[1,2] Yang He(Institute of Logic and Cognition, Sun Yat-sen University;Department of Philosophy, Sun Yat-sen University)

机构地区：[1]中山大学逻辑与认知研究所 [2]中山大学哲学系

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2017年第3期145-156,共12页Studies in Logic

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"基于广义逻辑的春秋政治论辩研究"(16CZX053)

摘　　要：百余年来,中国逻辑史研究重在构建类似于西方逻辑的中国古代逻辑理论的发生发展史,往往将中国古代论证实践视作西方逻辑理论的例证,从而忽视了中国古代论证实践的研究价值。与之相对,以中国古代论证实践为出发点,并基于文化背景与文本语境等相关因素予以如实的描述与分析,不仅有助于理解中国古代有关论证的理论学说,而且有助于中国古代的哲学、文学等相关领域研究。因此,中国古文献中颇为丰富的论证实践值得重视。In the past one hundred years,the mainstream of history of Chinese logic focusedon the construction of origin and history of ancient Chinese logical theories which weresimilar to the western logic theories.Within this research approach,ancient Chinese argumentativepractices were normally seen as some examples of western logical theories,and then the research value about these argumentative practices were ignored consequently.Compared with the above research approach,this paper presents another approachwhich takes the ancient Chinese argumentative practices as the starting point ofstudy,and further describes and analyzes the materials with respect to the cultural background,textual context and some other relevant factors.And this approach might behelpful to comprehensively understand the ancient Chinese argumentative theories,theresearch of ancient Chinese philosophy,literature and some other Chinese traditional culturalfield.Therefore,the abundant argumentative practical resources recorded in ancientChinese texts should be paid more attention to.

关 键 词：论证实践 逻辑理论 中国逻辑史 以中释中 

分 类 号：B81-092[哲学宗教—逻辑学]