效率与诚信之间:专利当然许可申请的规则重构  

Between Efficiency and Estoppel: Regulation Reconsitution on Application of License of Patent Right

作　　者：谢嘉图 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院 [2]重庆知识产权保护协同创新中心

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2017年第9期36-41,共6页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：《专利法》在第四次修订的草案中引入了当然许可制度,允许专利权人不受限制地提出当然许可声明。该规则理想地假设所有申请当然许可的专利权不存在权利负担,忽视了对已经给他人独占许可或排他许可的专利权在事后又申请当然许可的违法行为的规制。在比较法上,英、法、德各国均严格限制了专利权人申请当然许可的条件。从经济分析的角度出发,为专利权人申请当然许可作出合理限制也更突出效率。从立法论出发,赋予在先的被许可人对当然许可提出异议的权利更能够合理地解决该问题。从司法论出发,认定在后成立的专利许可无效,不仅符合立法原意,也契合专利法此次修改中所强调的诚实信用原则。The constitution of license of right is introduced into the<China Patent Law(Draft)>.It allow patentee apply license of right without any limitations.The constitution ideally assume that the patent which apply for license of right have no burdens.It neglect that the patent may be license exclusively before the application.The constitution of license of right in Patent Act of British and France as well as German set limitations strictly.In the method of economic analysis,these limitations make the constitution more efficient.In the legislative aspect,it is better to empower prior patentor the right to raise the objection.In the judicial aspect,the license which is established after the exclusively license should be regarded as invalid contract.This view meet the requirement of the intend of legislation and the Estoppel Principle in drafting texts.

关 键 词：专利当然许可申请 独占许可 效率违约理论 当然许可异议 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]