检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱学磊[1] ZHU Xue-lei(Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871)
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《南洋问题研究》2017年第4期45-56,96,共13页Southeast Asian Affairs
基 金:北京大学翁洪武科研原创基金项目(WHW201508)
摘 要:民主转型的最终目标是让民主成为"小镇里唯一的游戏"。在"政治司法化"的过程中,法院成为解决政治争议的主要场所。但是,对司法审查机关的错误定位可能导致其沦为政治斗争的工具,"司法政治化"色彩会愈加浓厚。泰国民主转型从"政治司法化"到"司法政治化"的退化,说明司法权并非存在于政治真空中。司法权与民主政治的发展水平呈现出正相关性。健康稳定的政治环境可以为司法权的发展创造必要的空间,法院对规则和秩序的守护又可以避免竞争的无序状态。发展司法权应当重视其所具有的政治属性,科学的谋划和积极稳妥的推进均是不可缺少的工作。Making democracy“the only game in town”is the goal of political transition in new democracies.During the process of“judicialization of politics”,courts turn out to be the places to dissolve various political controversies.However,a wrong positioning may lead the courts to be battlefields of political conflicts,and it will also contribute to a tendency of“politicalization of judicature”.The function degradation of Thailand’s constitutional court shows that judicial power never runs in political vacuum.There is a positive correlation between the health of judicial power and the level of democracy.A healthy and stable political environment may provide necessary space for judicial development,while the courts can help avoid a disorder political status.To build the judicial power in a new democracy,it is important to pay special attention to the political face of it.Both scientific planning and reliable promotion are important parts of this engineering.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.86.150