权能配置与风险回应:农地“三权分置”的制度设计  

Power Configuration and Risk Response:the System Design of “Three Rights Separation”in Rural Land

作　　者：董正爱[1] 谢忠洲 DONG Zheng ai;XIE Zhong zhou(Law School of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《时代法学》2017年第6期24-33,共10页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<环境风险规制的法律限度与秩序重构研究>(编号:14XFX018);中央高校基本科研业务费:风险视阈下环境群体性事件的法律控制(NO.106112015CDJSK08JD07);环境风险公私协力治理法律研究(NO.106112016CDJSK08006)阶段性成果

摘　　要：作为农村集体产权制度改革的重要组成部分,农地"三权分置"的制度改革极大地推动了农业现代化进程,亦能有效破解当前农村面临的土地抛荒、产业空心化等难题。因承包权、经营权的权能配置不清晰,对"非粮化"等风险回应缺乏制度设计,故对相应法律规范做出适当调试,以回应农村改革的现实需求实属必要。为规范农地流转和经营行为,回应新型农业主体参与农地经营可能引发的风险,在运用实证和规范分析法的基础上,系统梳理现行法律体系中涉及农地制度的相应规范,以期在准确定位相应权利,平衡权能配置,识别并回应风险的前提下进行制度设计,为经营权设立下的农业规模化经营提供相应帮助。As an important part of rural collective property rights system reform,the reform of the system of land“three rights division”has greatly promoted the process of agricultural modernization.And it can solve land deserting,industrial hollowing and other problems which the current rural facing effectively.Whats more,contractual rights and management rights allocation are not clear.And it is the lack of system design for the risk response to non food,it is essential to change the legal norms and respond to practical needs of rural reform.In order to regulate the land circulation and management behavior and response to the risk in the new agricultural business behavior,we use the method of empirical and normative analysis and read the corresponding specifications about the current legal system of farmland.We locate the corresponding rights,make a balance in power configuration and design rule to recognize and response risk.Maybe it can provide some help for the scale operation of agriculture management.

关 键 词：三权分置 承包权 经营权 权能配置 风险回应 

分 类 号：DF45[政治法律—经济法学]