论先期违约中的利益权衡  

On the Balance of Interests in Anticipatory Breach of Contract

作　　者：王道发[1] WANG Dao fa(Law School of Renmin University of China, Beijing 100072, China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100072

出　　处：《时代法学》2017年第6期54-65,共12页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：《合同法》在规范内容上对不安抗辩权和先期违约作出了不同的规定,两者之间具有一定的联系,但是先期违约制度注重解决损害赔偿问题。在本质上,先前违约不必然以违约责任来解决损失救济,在适用过程中应当重视利益权衡的方式,有限制地明确债权人的选择权和债务人的补救权,并且厘清相关风险承担规则,实现合同当事人之间的利益平衡。The contract law makes different provisions on the unsafe right of defense and the anticipatory breach of contract in the standard content,and there is certain benefit between them,but the system of anticipatory breach of contract pays attention to solving the problem of compensation for damages.In essence,the previous default is not necessarily to breach of contract to solve the loss of relief,in the application process should pay attention to the balance of interests of the way,the right to choose a clear limit of the creditors and debtor remedy rights,and clarify the relevant rules of risk allocation,to achieve the balance of interests between the parties of the contract.

关 键 词：先期违约 违约责任 利益权衡 风险承担 

分 类 号：DF525[政治法律—民商法学]