财政转移支付、地方公共支出和“粘蝇纸效应”——基于边疆与内陆面板数据模型的经验证据  

Fiscal Transfer Payment,Local Public Expenditure and "Flypaper Effect" ——Empirical Evidence Based on Frontier and Inland Panel Data Model

作　　者：姜鑫[1] 罗佳[1] Jiang Xin;Luo Jia(Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学,重庆400067

出　　处：《当代经济管理》2018年第1期72-77,共6页Contemporary Economic Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<财政转移支付制度对边疆基本公共服务均等化效应及对策研究>(14XSH021)

摘　　要：国内外经典经验研究表明,中央财政转移支付对地方公共支出的刺激作用大于增加等额当地居民收入的刺激作用,这被称为"粘蝇纸效应"。文章对我国内陆地区和边疆地区转移支付的制度效应进行面板数据分析,发现内陆和边疆人均一般预算支出方程中的人均转移支付系数分别是人均GDP系数的10.711倍和6.062倍,我国转移支付同样存在这一现象。根据经验分析结果,应该促进边境地区转移支付的规范化管理,加强资金使用的绩效评价,完善居民需求表达和民主决策机制,以提高转移支付资金的配置与使用效率。The domestic and foreign classical empirical research shows that the central fiscal transfer payment has more stimulating effect on local public expenditure than that of increasing equal income of local residents,which is called"flypaper effect".This paper analyzes the institutional effects of transfer payment in China's inland areas and border areas by panel data,finds that the per capita transfer payment coefficients in the general budget expenditure equations of inland and border areas are10.711times and6.062times that of the per capita GDP coefficient respectively,and transfer payment in China also has this phenomenon.According to the empirical results,we should promote the standardized transfer of payment management in border areas,strengthen the performance evaluation of the use of funds,and improve the residents'demand expression and democratic decision-making mechanism,to improve the transfer payment allocation and efficient use of funds.

关 键 词：“粘蝇纸效应” 财政转移支付 面板数据模型 边疆地区 

分 类 号：F812.2[经济管理—财政学]