检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘悦[1] 李发伟[2] 李冬梅[1] LIU Yue;LI Fawei;LI Dongmei(Heze Medical School, Heze 274000, Shandong, China;Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, Shandong, China)
机构地区:[1]菏泽医学专科学校,山东菏泽274000 [2]曲阜师范大学,山东曲阜273165
出 处:《辽宁体育科技》2018年第1期53-56,共4页Liaoning Sport Science and Technology
摘 要:对里约奥运会、伦敦世锦赛各国田径优势项目进行分析,结果显示:美国位居榜首,肯尼亚位居第二,中国分位第四、第五;各国优势项目分布广泛,肯尼亚、埃塞俄比亚、中国以体能主导类耐力性项群为主,美国、牙买加、加拿大、英国、荷兰以体能主导类速度性项群为主,波兰、德国、中国以体能主导类快速力量性为主。This paper comparatively analyses the track and field dominant events of every country from Rio Olympic Games and London World Championship by using the documents,and gets the result that USA is at the top of list,Kenya is ranked the2nd place,and China is individually at the4th and5th place;the dominant events of every country have a wide distribution,in which to take the endurance events as principle is including Kenya,Ethiopia and China;to take the speed items as main is including USA,Canada,UK,and Netherlands;and Poland,Germany and China are dominated by the speed force events.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28