检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Liyuan Fang Xiangqian Zhou Haiming Xie Wanchun Jiang
出 处:《国际计算机前沿大会会议论文集》2017年第1期79-81,共3页International Conference of Pioneering Computer Scientists, Engineers and Educators(ICPCSEE)
摘 要:The tail latency of end-user requests,which directly impacts the user experience and the revenue,is highly related to its corresponding numerous accesses in key-value stores.The replica selection algorithm is crucial to cut the tail latency of these key-value accesses.Recently,the C3 algorithm,which creatively piggybacks the queue-size of waiting keys from replica servers for the replica selection at clients,is proposed in NSDI 2015.Although C3 improves the tail latency a lot,it suffers from the timeliness issue on the feedback information,which directly influences the replica selection.In this paper,we analysis the evaluation of queuesize of waiting keys of C3,and some findings of queue-size variation were made.It motivate us to propose the Prediction-Based Replica Selection(PRS)algorithm,which predicts the queue-size at replica servers under the poor timeliness condition,instead of utilizing the exponentially weighted moving average of the state piggybacked queue-size as in C3.Consequently,PRS can obtain more accurate queue-size at clients than C3,and thus outperforms C3 in terms of cutting the tail latency.Simulation results confirm the advantage of PRS over C3.
关 键 词:Prediction REPLICA selection Tail-latency KEY-VALUE STORES
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.24.158