HPF法脱硫工艺的对比与优化  

Comparison of and improvement on HPF desulfurization processes

作　　者：孙帅 梅冠宇 贾昆明 Sun Shuai;Mei Guanyu;Jia Kunming(ACRE Coking&Refractory Engineering Consulting Corporation,MCC,Dalian 116085,China)

机构地区：[1]中冶焦耐工程技术有限公司,大连116085

出　　处：《燃料与化工》2018年第2期56-58,共3页Fuel & Chemical Processes

摘　　要：介绍了HPF法脱硫较为常见的2种工艺,并且对高塔再生工艺和喷射氧化再生工艺进行了改进。针对2种工艺的投资费用、能源消耗、占地和操作稳定性等方面进行对比分析。高塔再生工艺再生效果好、操作稳定性高,而喷射氧化再生工艺在投资和占地方面有优势。Two typical HPF desulfurization processes are introduced,and improvements have been made for high tower regeneration process and jet-oxidation regeneration process.These two processes are compared in the aspects of investment,energy consumption,land occupation and operation stability.The result shows that high tower regeneration process has the advantages of good regeneration effect,high operation stability,while jet-oxidation regeneration process has the advantages of less investment and land occupation.

关 键 词：HPF法脱硫 高塔再生工艺 喷射氧化再生工艺 

分 类 号：X784[环境科学与工程—环境工程]