浅议我国民法典制定债法通则的必要性  

Analysis of the Necessity of Establishing the “General Principles of Law of Obligation” in Chinese Civil Code

作　　者：敬梓源 JING Zi-yuan(School of Law, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《信阳农林学院学报》2018年第1期5-7,共3页Journal of Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University

摘　　要：债法是民法的重要内容,制定债法通则顺应了我国"制定民法典"的时代需求。提取债法的共同规则有利于对法条未尽事项拾遗补阙,同时亦能保持债法体系的开放性,促进民商法规范在债法中的融合。考虑到债法一般规则对债法具体制度的抽象技术和概括程度、"准合同"规则在债法中的安置以及民法典篇幅大小等因素,应以债法通则命名民法典中债法一般规则,并将该部分独立成编。若债法通则未能独立成编,将其内容规定于合同编中亦是可以接受的选择。Law of obligation is an important content in civil law.Establishing the“General Principles of Law of Obligation”meets the requirements of“Compiling Chinese Civil Code”.Summarizing the common rules in the law of obligation not only facilitates filling the gaps in law,but also guarantees the openness of the system of law of obligation,and promotes the integration of civil and commercial law into the law of obligation.In consideration of the abstract level,the position of quasi-contract in the law of obligation and the length of civil code,the common rules of the law of obligation should be named as“General Principles of Law of Obligation”,and this part should be compiled relatively independently in the civil code.If not,it is also acceptable that this part is included in the contract chapter.

关 键 词：债法通则 民法典抽象技术 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]