检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雅敏[1] 刘娴[1] 胡建英[1] WANG Yamin;LIU Xian;HU Jianying(Hospital of Sichuan Provincial Armed Police Force,Leshan,Sichuan 614000,China)
出 处:《现代临床医学》2018年第2期86-88,共3页Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨微创闭式引流术在治疗结核性胸腔积液中的应用价值。方法:将98例结核性胸腔积液患者分为治疗组和对照组。对照组采用胸腔穿刺术进行胸腔抽液、注药等;治疗组采用微创胸腔闭式引流术,留置深静脉导管于胸腔进行抽液、引流、注药等。比较两组治疗结束时胸腔积液深度、胸腔积液吸收所需时间、完成单次操作的时间及并发症的发生率。结果:治疗组治疗结束时胸腔积液深度、胸腔积液吸收所需时间、完成单次操作的时间及胸膜反应的发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:微创闭式引流术对结核性胸腔积液的疗效、安全性均优于胸腔穿刺抽液术,且操作简便,值得推广。Objective:To investigate the application value of minimally invasive closed thoracic drainage in tuberculous pleural effusion.Methods:98 patients with tuberculous pleural effusion were divided into treatment group and control group.The control group underwent thoracentesis for the suction of pleural effusion and drug infusion.The observation group underwent minimally invasive closed thoracic drainage,and the deep venous catheter was retained in thoracic cavity for the suction of pleural effusion,drainage and drug infusion.The deepness of hydrothorax after treatment,the time of hydrothorax absorption,the time required to completing single operation,and complication incidence were compared between the two groups.Results:The treatment group showed lower deepness of hydrothorax after treatment,shorter time of hydrothorax absorption,shorter time required to complete single operation,and lower incidence of pleural reaction than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The therapeutic effect and safety of minimally invasive closed thoracic drainage are superior to thoracentesis for tuberculous pleural effusion.It is easy to operate and worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.139.45