预见性护理干预对改善整形美容者焦虑和抑郁心理的影响分析  

Analysis of the Effects of Prospective Nursing Interventions on Anxiety and Depression in Improving Plastic Surgery

作　　者：陈卫卫[1] 李莲芝[1] CHEN Weiwei;LI Lianzhi(Burn and Plastic Surgery Department, Affiliated Hospital of Ji’ning Medical College, Ji’ning Shandong 272000, China)

机构地区：[1]济宁医学院附属医院烧伤整形科,山东济宁272000

出　　处：《中国卫生标准管理》2018年第6期193-195,共3页China Health Standard Management

摘　　要：目的分析护理干预对改善整形美容者焦虑和抑郁心理的影响。方法将2016年1月—2017年3月我院收治的100例整形美容者随机分成两组,每组50例。两组分别给予整形美容者常规护理干预(对照组)和预见性护理干预(观察组),比较两组患者的焦虑、抑郁评分和满意度情况。结果观察组患者护理后的SAS评分和SDS评分(31.15±2.64)分、(30.09±1.87)分,均明显低于对照组(42.28±3.57)分、(41.59±4.06)分,且其HAMA评分(12.19±0.86分)和HAMD评分(14.19±1.02分)亦较对照组的(16.35±1.08)分、(16.26±0.94)分更低,两组患者的满意度评分比较[观察组(92.29±3.56)分;对照组(73.35±2.82)分],差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论预见性护理干预应用于整形美容者中能有效减轻患者的焦虑与抑郁情况,提高患者的护理满意度。Objective To analyze the effects of nursing intervention on anxiety and depression in plastic surgery patients.Methods A total of100plastic cosmetic patients admitted to our hospital from January2016to March2017were randomly divided into two groups,50patients in each group.The two groups were given routine nursing intervention(control group)and predictive nursing intervention(observation group)respectively,and the anxiety,depression scores and satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results The SAS score and SDS score(31.15±2.64)and(30.09+1.87)of the patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(42.28±3.57)and(41.59±4.06).And the HAMA score(12.19±0.86)and HAMD score(14.19±1.02)were lower than that of the control group(16.35±1.08)and(16.26+0.94).The satisfaction score of the observation group(92.29±3.56),and the control group(73.35±2.82).The difference was statistically significant,P<0.05.Conclusion Predictive nursing intervention can significantly improve the negative emotion of cosmetic patients.

关 键 词：预见性护理干预 焦虑 抑郁 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]