检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张艳娜 江炯雄 陈燕嫦 霍本燕 ZHANG Yan-na;JIANG Jiong-xiong;CHEN Yan-chang;HUO Ben-yan(Jinan University Forensic Expertise Center,Guangzhou 510630,China;Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau,Guangzhou 510000,China;Center for Medicolegal Expertise of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080,China)
机构地区:[1]暨南大学司法鉴定中心,广东广州510630 [2]广州市公安局,广东广州510000 [3]中山大学法医鉴定中心,广东广州510080
出 处:《河南科技大学学报(医学版)》2018年第1期72-74,共3页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Medical Science
摘 要:目的探讨如何在司法鉴定中区分交通事故所致骨折损伤中的真假"碰瓷"敲诈案。方法对2例"碰瓷"敲诈案的案情、临床症状与体征、影像学材料及法医学检查进行客观分析,通过影像学材料结合初诊时的临床症状来区别新旧骨折,进行交通事故因果关系和伤残等级鉴定,区分真假"碰瓷"敲诈案。结果 2例"碰瓷"案中,真"碰瓷"案1例,交通事故与个体左侧下肢骨折无直接因果关系;假"碰瓷"案1例,个体右胫骨再次骨折虽不构成伤残等级,但交通事故与个体右胫骨再次骨折之间存在直接因果关系。结论影像学材料是辨别真假"碰瓷"的关键因素,但确定是否为"碰瓷"敲诈案一定要结合案情、临床症状体征及法医学检查。Objective To discuss how to identify the fracture differences between true“Pengci”extortive cases and the fake ones of traffic accident in forensic identification. Methods The details of two“Pengci”cases were analyzed by clinical symptoms and physical signs of the injury,imaging materials and forensic examination results.New and old fractures can be distinguished by analyzing the imaging materials and preliminary diagnosis,then the relationship between the wound and accident can be confirmed,and the disability grade can be identified.Therefore the true and fake extortive cases can be distinguished. Results In the two cases,one is true“Pengci”,and the fracture on the left lower extremity has no correlation with the accident.Another is fake one,there was a direct relationship between a traffic accident and the individual’s fracture on the right lowe extremity though it can’t reach disability grade. Conclusion Imaging materials are the key factors to distinguish between true and fake“Pengci”cases.However,it is necessary to combine the case facts,clinical symptoms and signs,and forensic examinations to determine whether or not it is a“Pengci”blackmailing case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.147.211