检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张春桃 苏银霞[2] 姚华[2] 朱筠[2] 周红 汪惠才[2] 孙高峰[4] 李豫凯[5] ZHANG Chuntao;SU Yinxia;YAO Hua;ZHU Jun;ZHOU Hong;WANG Huicai;SUN Gaofeng;Li Yuka(School of Public Health,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China;The First Affiliated Hospital,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Urumqi High-tech Industrial Development Zone, Urumqi 830013,China;Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Urumqi,Urumqi 830000,China;Party School of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学公共卫生学院,乌鲁木齐830011 [2]新疆医科大学第一附属医院,乌鲁木齐830054 [3]乌鲁木齐市高新区疾病预防控制中心,乌鲁木齐830013 [4]乌鲁木齐市疾病预防控制中心,乌鲁木齐830000 [5]新疆医科大学党校办,乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《新疆医科大学学报》2018年第2期245-248,共4页Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发项目(2016B03048);新疆医科大学2015年度人文社科基金项目(2015XYDSK23)
摘 要:目的了解乌鲁木齐市基层卫生人员糖尿病相关知识的掌握情况,为开展糖尿病知识培训提供依据。方法选取参加乌鲁木齐市高新区疾病预防控制中心举办的慢性病防治工作培训的17所基层医疗机构的364名基层卫生人员,进行糖尿病知识问卷调查,经相关知识培训后,比较培训前后糖尿病知识掌握情况。结果基层卫生人员年龄20~59岁,从事基层医疗卫生工作年限2~27a。培训前仅2.22%的基层卫生人员得分为优秀,68.89%的研究对象得分为较差;培训后70.83%的研究对象得分为良好,整体成绩更好。培训前基层卫生人员对糖尿病的诊断部分掌握程度较好,并发症和相关危险因素部分掌握较差;培训后,基层卫生人员对各部分糖尿病相关知识掌握情况与培训前相比差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。基层卫生人员在是否接受过专业培训方面的得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同职称和学历的基层卫生人员接受培训前后得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对基层卫生人员进行糖尿病知识培训效果明显,基于对培训前后得分的掌握,今后的培训重点应放在糖尿病流行病学、病因及药物治疗方面,以满足基层卫生人员的切实需求。ObjectiveIn order to understand the level of the grasp of diabetes knowledge in junior health personnel in Urumqi.It's a theoretical support for carry out Diabetes knowledge training.MethodsA controlled before-after design was used in the Questionnaire investigation and the prevention and treatment knowledge of diabetes of 360 junior health personnels from 17 primary medical institutions were evaluated,who takes part in the training of the Non-communicable Disease in Urumqi Center for Disease Control and Prevention.ResultsWorkers aged from 20 to 59 years old,engaged in primary health care work years 2 to 27 years.Before the training,only 2.22%of primary health workers scored excellent,68.89%of the respondents scored poorly;70.83%of the respondents scored well after training and the overall score was better.Before the training,the diagnostic of diabetes was better,and the complication and related risk factors were poorly mastered.After training,there was significant difference between the junior health personnels in knowledge of various parts of diabetes and before training(P<0.05).There was significant difference in scores of professional training(P<0.05).There was significant difference in scores of primary health workers with different titles and qualifications before and after receiving training(P<0.05).ConclusionThe knowledge of diabetes was greatly improved through the training.Based on the mastery of scores before and after training,future training should focus on aspects of diabetes epidemiology,etiology and drug treatment to meet the practical needs of junior health personnels.
分 类 号:R195.4[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.239.193