检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗美莲[1] 叶春丽[1] Luo Meilian;Ye Chunli(Longgang Central Hospital,Shenzhen 518000)
出 处:《数理医药学杂志》2018年第4期619-620,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨循证护理对行全麻手术的老年患者术后苏醒效果的影响。方法:在某院2015年2月~2017年2月期间进行全麻手术老年患者中抽取154例,选用抽签法分组。对照组77例行常规基础护理,探讨组77例行循证护理,比较两组各个时间段VAS评分和满意情况。结果:探讨组术后6h、12h和24hVAS评分是(3.04±1.12)分、(2.15±1.06)分和(2.04±1.63)分,对照组是(4.02±1.79)分、(3.44±1.35)分和(3.11±1.24)分,两组对比差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05);探讨组满意度92.21%,对照组75.32%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:循证护理可有效减少全麻手术患者术后苏醒时间,改善患者满意情况,有较高临床使用价值。Objective:To investigate the effect of evidence-based nursing on postoperative recovery of elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia surgery.Methods:154 cases of elderly patients with general anesthesia treated in a hospital from February 2015 and February 2017 were selected and divided into control group and discussion group according to the lottery method,with 77 cases in each group.The control group was given routine basic care,and the discussion group was given evidence-based care,then the VAS score and satisfaction in each time period between the two groups were compared.Results:In the discussion group,the VAS score after 6 h,12 h and 24 h was(3.04±1.12),(2.15±1.06)and(2.04±1.63),and those in the control group was(4.02±1.79),(3.44±1.35)and(3.11±1.24),the difference between the two groups was significant,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The satisfaction of the study group was 92.21%and that of the control group was 5.32%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Evidence-based care can effectively reduce postoperative resuscitation time,and improve patient satisfaction,which has high clinical value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30