建筑物日照采光领域管制标准的私法适用探究——基于近十年判决的实证分析  

Study on Private Law Effectiveness of Architectural Lighting Regulatory Standards: An Empirical Analysis Based on Judgment in the Past Decade

作　　者：巩固[1] 陈瑶[1] GONG Gu;CHEN Yao(Guanghua Law School,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期24-39,共16页Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心研究项目

摘　　要：日照采光领域管制标准如何发挥私法效力在理论上向来颇具争议。对近十年来建筑物日照采光领域民事判决书的实证分析表明,管制标准在私法裁判中得到广泛适用,"超标担责"已成通例,标准与损害事实认定、容忍限度确认、注意义务判断等相结合,"达标免责"运用普遍。从实效角度来看,私法裁判对管制标准的倚重能发挥后者科学权威、明确统一、节约资源、尊重行政等方面的优势。但管制标准也存在内容单一僵化、价值目标偏低、合法性存疑、覆盖范围有限等问题,不应绝对化使用。针对现存问题,未来应从丰富标准体系和细化司法规则两方面加以完善。How architectural lighting regulatory standards function in private law has always been a controversial issue in theory.The empirical analysis of the civil judgments in the field of architectural lighting in the recent ten years shows that regulatory standards have been widely applied in private law referees.The principle of excess liability has become a common practice.Standards work together with damage confirmation,tolerance limitation and duty of care judgment.Exempt from liability within standard is commonly used.From a practical point of view,regulatory standards have the advantages of scientific authority,clear unification,resource conservation and respect for administration.However,there are still problems in regulatory standards,which thus should not be used absolutely,such as rigidity of contents,low value targets,doubts on their legality and limited coverage.In view of the existing problems,it is necessary to improve from the following two aspects as enriching the standard system and refining the judicial rules.

关 键 词：日照采光 管制标准 私法效力 

分 类 号：D913.7[政治法律—民商法学] X32[政治法律—法学]