评21世纪以来联合国国际贸易法委员会国际贸易法统一化立法工作的新发展——以发展中国家利益为视角  

Comment on the New Developments of the UNCITRAL's 21^(st) Legislature for the Unification of International Trade Law: From the Perspective of the Interests of the Developing Countries

作　　者：姜作利[1] Jiang Zuoli

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院

出　　处：《国际法研究》2018年第2期67-80,共14页Chinese Review of International Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"WTO法理框架中生态文明理念之建构与中国对策研究"(项目编号:13BFX151)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：联合国国际贸易法委员会(United Nations Commission on International Trade Law,简称UNCITRAL)作为联合国系统内国际贸易法领域唯一的核心法律机构,在21世纪前的国际贸易法统一化立法中取得了一定成就,得到了发达国家的赞赏。然而,从现代实质正义及发展中国家的视角看,UNCITRAL的国际贸易法统一化立法工作一直处于发达国家的主导之下,存在诸如漠视现代实质正义和发展中国家利益、存在大量法律漏洞、语言模糊及立法工具滞后等缺陷,受到了发展中国家的质疑。为此,自21世纪以来,UNCITRAL在国际贸易法统一化立法中进行了一些探索,取得了一定的新发展。遗憾的是,这些新发展基本上仅限于程序层面,离现代实质正义及发展中国家的要求还相距甚远。中国应采取正确对策,积极参与和推动国际贸易法的立法工作,在习近平主席提出"人类命运共同体"倡议的历史机遇中,主动参与和主导与其他发展中国家的合作以增强合力,大力宣传现代实质正义的法律理念,将"共同但有区别责任原则"纳入UNCITRAL的立法和修法工作中,为实现全球实质正义及维护发展中国家利益做出不懈的努力。UNCITRAL as the only core legal agency in the United Nations system has made some achievements in the unification of international trade law and thus won praises from the developed countries before 21st century.However,from the perspectives of modern substantive justice and the developing countries,UNCITRAL's legislature for the unification of international trade law has been dominated by the developed countries,and consequently has pushed the jurisprudence and rules in favor of the developed countries,and has been naturally criticized by the developing countries for its defects such as the indifference towards the modern substantive justice and the interests of the developing countries,existence of numerous legal gaps and ambiguous words and lagging legislative instruments.Therefore,we should take correct countermeasures to push forward its legislative work,such as seizing the historical opportunity of Xi Jinping's initiative of“a community of shared future for mankind”,joining force with other developing countries,spreading the legal idea of modern substantive justice,and bringing the“Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility”into the legislative and revising work,so as to make unremitting efforts for the global substantive justice and the protection of the developing countries.

关 键 词：国际贸易法统一化 现代实质正义 发展中国家 共同但有区别责任原则 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]