20世纪前半期甲骨文、金文与《诗经》研究述略  

"Book of Songs" Research Review In The Study of Oracle And Bronze In The First Half of Twentieth Century

作　　者：陈斐斐 陈良武 CHEN Fei-fei;CHEN Liang-wu(the Faculty of Arts,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou,Fujiang 363000,China)

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学文学院,福建漳州363000

出　　处：《牡丹江师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期81-91,共11页Journal of Mudanjiang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(14XZW019)

摘　　要：《诗经》是中国现存的第一部诗歌总集,作为儒家经典之一,《诗经》的阐释和研究在学术史上始终处于显学的地位,历代学者都对其倍加关注。20世纪前半期,地下出土材料丰富,随着金石学、甲骨卜辞研究的推进,《诗经》研究进入了一个崭新的境域。在继承前辈智慧的同时,借助于甲骨文、金文研究成果,以地下出土材料与传世文献互证互补的二重证据法,在《诗经》名物考释,作品年代的考释,文字、训诂和音韵研究领域,以及儒家《诗》论研究等方面往前迈进了一大步。这些成果对厘清因文献不足而悬而未决的争议,开拓《诗经》研究的空间等方面都是大有裨益的。"Book of Songs"is our country’s first collection of poetry,as one of the important Confucian classics,it is always in the interpretation of the prominent position in the academic history,and the scholars pay more attention to it.In twentieth Century with the archaeological discoveries,rich unearthed material,research of inscriptions on oracle bones and ancient bronze objects advance,"Book of Songs"has entered a new field of study.In the succession of predecessors with wisdom,found in a large number of archaeological,underground excavated material and other documents handed down the double evidence law become complementary."Book of Songs"naming and system interpretation,interpretation,text works in the school release,exegesis and interpretation of terms and phonological research both the Confucian school theory of"Book of Songs"is a major step forward.These may offer help to clarify the shortage in suspense controversy,and"Book of Songs"open study on the space.

关 键 词：《诗经》研究 甲骨文 金文 考校释读 儒家《诗》论 

分 类 号：K207.8[历史地理—历史学] I207.22[历史地理—中国史]