检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李嘉恒 LI Jiaheng(School of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出 处:《焦作大学学报》2018年第1期14-18,共5页Journal of Jiaozuo University
基 金:2014年度国家社科基金一般项目"民事诉讼案外第三人撤销之诉研究"(14BFX157);贵州大学研究生创新基金"虚假民事诉讼及其治理研究"(研人文2017001)
摘 要:第三人撤销之诉作为特殊的权益救济途径,自设立之初就备受关注。因其与案外人申请再审制度有较高的趋同度,实践之中的适用冲突问题亟待解决,文章从第三人撤销之诉着手,区分适用主体,探寻其在实务之中出现的问题并进行分析,以辨析二者的界限。以制度适用为中心,找寻权益救济与既判力稳定的平衡点,探究我国权益救济的途径。As a special way of remedy for rights and interests,the action of the third party has received much attention since its establishment.Because the outsider retrial system has a high degree of convergence,the practice of conflict problems to be solved,the withdrawal of the third person to distinguish the subject,the problems are explored and analyzed in the practice the two boundaries.With the application of the system as the center,the balance point between the rights and interests relief and the res judicata should be found to explore the way of the right relief.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.236