检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雨[1] ZHANG Yu(Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230601)
机构地区:[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230601
出 处:《浙江万里学院学报》2018年第1期32-36,共5页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
摘 要:在群众眼中,法官是法律的化身,是公平正义的代表,为了树立良好的司法职业形象,规范法官基本行为,各国都对法官行为作出要求。但因每个国家的经济、历史、文化等不同,各国的法官行为规范也不尽相同且各有千秋。比较研究各国法官行为规范,不仅有利于了解法官这一职业的共性,同时也有利于了解本国的法官行为规范特色,同时结合我国具体司法现状,借鉴他国有益做法,完善我国的《法官行为规范》。In the eyes of the mass,the judge is the embodiment of the law,is the representative of fairness and justice.In order to establish a good judicial professional image,to standardize the behavior of judges becomes a common request in all countries.However,due to the different economy,history and culture,the judge's behaviors are not the same obviously.It is not only beneficial to us to understand the commonality of judges’professionalism,but also to understand the characteristics of judges’behavior in China.At the same time,we would learn from the practices of other countries to improve the judges’cod of conducts in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7