检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴乐天 蔡永欢 雍其安 邓大鹏 DAI Le-tian;CAI Yong-huan;YONG Qi-an(Anhui GoldenFarm AgroScience Co.Ltd.,Hefei,Anhui 230038)
机构地区:[1]安徽金敦福农业科技有限公司,安徽合肥230038 [2]安徽农业大学,安徽合肥230036
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2018年第8期137-139,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
摘 要:[目的]研究新型叶面肥YZS和GZS在水稻不同生育时期组合喷施对水稻产量的影响。[方法]设置2个处理,处理(1)是先在分蘖期喷施YZS 750 g/hm^2,然后在孕穗期喷施GZS 750 g/hm^2;处理(2)是在处理(1)基础上,在水稻齐穗期再喷施GZS 750 g/hm^2,研究不同处理对水稻产量的影响。[结果]水稻分蘖期喷施GZS 10 d后观察发现,2个处理水稻株高分别为86.5和86.3 cm,而对照株高为88.3 cm,差异极显著;根长分别为12.1和12.3 cm,对照为11.4 cm,差异显著,且处理根系数量多于对照。收获前2 d测产结果表明,2个处理有效穗数和穗粒数与对照无显著差异;2个处理结实率分别为82.72%和83.96%,对照仅为74.85%,差异显著;2个处理千粒重分别为24.77和25.80 g,对照为24.13 g,差异显著;2个处理理论产量分别为11 471.85、10 531.35 kg/hm^2,对照仅为9 662.4 kg/hm^2,差异显著。[结论]YZS对水稻株高有抑制作用,但对根系生长有明显的促进作用;2种处理均显著提高水稻产量,齐穗期喷施GZS可明显增加千粒重,增产效果更明显。[Objective]The effects of combined foliar fertilization of YZS and GZS on rice yield in different growth stages were studied by field experiment.[Method]Treatment①was 750 g/hm 2 first of spraying YZS at tillering stage and 750 g/hm 2 of the GZS at booting stages.Treatment②was based on the treatment①,and the GZS was 750 g/hm 2 in the full heading stage.[Result]Ten days later after the rice tillering stage,the rice plant height were 86.5 and 86.3 cm respectively,while the contrast area was 88.3 cm,and the difference was significant.The root length was 12.1 and 12.3 cm respectively,the control area was 11.4 cm,the difference was significant,and the number of root systems in the treatment area was more than that of the control area.The results showed that there was no significant difference between the effective panicle number and the number of grains per spike in the two treatments.The seed setting rate was 82.72%and 83.96%respectively,and the control area was only 74.85%,the difference was significant.The 1 000-grain weight of two treatments areas were 24.77 and 25.80 g respectively,and 24.13 g in the control area,which was significantly different.The theoretical yield of the two treatments were 11 471.85 kg/hm 2 and 10 531.35 kg/hm 2 respectively,and the control area was only 9 662.4 kg/hm 2.The difference was very significant.[Conclusion]YZS had an inhibitory effect on the plant height,but had a significant effect on root growth.Both of the combined treatments significantly increased the yield of rice,and the effect of the spraying of the GZS in the full heading stage was significantly increased.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.184.21