检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨蕙铭 么会良 YANG Hui-ming;YAO Hui-liang(Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410012;Hunan TianDiRen Law Firm,Changsha,Hunan 410012)
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410012 [2]湖南天地人律师事务所,湖南长沙410012
出 处:《怀化学院学报》2018年第2期74-77,共4页Journal of Huaihua University
摘 要:释明权制度在大陆法系的民事诉讼活动当中被称为"当事人主义的修正器",最先起源于德国。但是,在我国,法律并未明确规定法律释明权,也没有对于当事人释明利益程序救济的规定。此种情况下,当事人的释明利益在程序救济上遭遇困境。试图在分析当前我国释明权与当事人释明利益程序救济现状的基础上,提出建议,以完善我国当事人释明利益的程序救济。The system of the right of interpretation originated in Germany,which is called"the modifier of litigant doctrine"in the civil litigation of the civil law system of the civil law system,which is the judge to guide the parties to clarify the fixed point of dispute in the neutral position.And the power to guide and assist the parties to conduct an effective and positive debate is based on the main facts and evidence of the case.However,in our country,the right of legal interpretation is not clearly stipulated in the law.There is also no provision for the parties to explain the benefits of procedural relief.In this case,the author tries to put forward some suggestions on the basis of analyzing the current situation of the interpretation of the right to release and the relief of the procedure of the parties in order to improve our party to explain the interests of the procedural relief.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15