基于“全球性问题”的中国特色“全球治理”方案：提出与路径--兼析西方语境“两大陷阱”  

The “Global Governance” Program with Chinese Characteristic Based on“Global Issues”:Propose and Approach to the Road——An Analysis of the “Two Great Traps” of the Western Context

作　　者：张茂一[1] ZHAO Maoyi(School of Political Science and Law,Leshan Normal University,Leshan Sichuan 614000,China)

机构地区：[1]乐山师范学院政法学院,四川乐山614000

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2018年第3期90-98,123,共10页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：西方语境的"修昔底德陷阱"与"金德尔伯格陷阱"被再次提出,其是西方世界"中国威胁论"与"中国责任论"的变种。这两大陷阱无论是从中国传统的文化基因与中国外交的实践逻辑来看都具有臆想性,不是真实的"全球性问题"所在。真实的"全球性问题"的存在具有产生的客观性,西方的治理方案已经失效,亟待有立足人类共同命运的新方案。十九大报告关于推动命运共同体的全球治理方案直面真实的"全球性问题",从方向、手段、平台、突破口等四个方面创新了全球治理的理论与实践,必将推动世界发展的新时代与全球治理的新征程。The“Thucydides Trap”and“Kindleberge Trap”has been put forward again in the western context which is the variation of“China Threat Theory”and“Chinese Responsibility Theory”in the western world.Both of these two traps are surmise that hypothetically based on Chinese traditional cultural genes and the practical logic of Chinese diplomacy are not real“global issue”in the real world.The existence of the real“global issue”has the objectivity,and since the western governance plan has failed,thus the new plan is urgently needed to be built up for the common destiny of the mankind.The report of the 19th CPC National Congress promotes the fate community of global governance program which is facing up to the real“global issue”,and the theory and practice of global governance has been innovated by four aspects which are:direction,means,platform and the breakthrough.Consequently,what mentioned above must promote a new era of the world development and a new journey of global governance.

关 键 词：两大陷阱 全球性问题 中国特色 全球治理方案 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]