检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田有粮[1] 班东林 胡菲菲[1] 张昕[1] 高绩真 王红艳[1] 韩焕萍[1] 张卉[1] 李军 TIAN You-liang;BAN Dong-lin;Hu Fei-fei(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,the 306th Hospital of PLA,Beijing,100101,China)
机构地区:[1]解放军第306医院(战略支援部队总医院)康复医学科,北京100101 [2]解放军战略支援部队兴城疗养院理疗科,辽宁兴城125105 [3]火箭军总医院中医与康复医学科,北京100088
出 处:《颈腰痛杂志》2018年第2期158-160,共3页The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
摘 要:目的探讨体外冲击波与脉冲短波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床效果。方法符合诊断标准的60例原发性肱骨外上髁炎患者,随机分为观察组和对照组各30例,治疗组采用体外冲击波治疗,对照组采用脉冲短波治疗,分别于治疗前后采用活动痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS评分法)和压痛记分法进行指标评估,观察比较两组疗效并进行统计学处理。结果两组治疗前后VAS评分和压痛评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),以治疗组更好(P<0.05)。治疗组与对照组的总有效率分别为96.67%和86.67%(P<0.05),两组差异具有统计学意义。结论体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎效果良好,优于脉冲短波疗法,且具有简便易行、取效迅速、疗程短等优点,值得临床推广应用。Objective To study the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and pulsed ultrashort wave therapy in the treatment of external humeral epicondylitis.Methods Sixty patients with external humeral epicondylitis were randomly divided into two groups,with 30 cases in each group.The experimental group received extracorporeal shock wave therapy,and the control group received pulsed ultrashort wave therapy.Visual analogue scale(VAS)and the scales for sign were evaluated before and after treatment.The clinical effect was compared between the two groups.Results The VAS score and the scales for sign in two groups before and after treatment had significant differences(P<0.01).The total effective rates of experimental group and control group were 96.67%and 86.67%,the difference was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Extracorporeal shock wave therapy has good effect in the treatment of external humeral epicondylitis,and it has advantages of simple application,short treatment course,which is worth using in clinical treatment.
分 类 号:TJ011.1[兵器科学与技术—兵器发射理论与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.180.18