检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯可佩 杨小莉 刘超 蔡文婷 FENG Ke-pei;YANG Xiao-li;LIU Chao;CAI Wen-ting(Changqing Oilfield Workers'Hospital,Xi'an 710201;Meikang Biological Polytron Technologies Inc,Ningbo 315000,China)
机构地区:[1]陕西长庆油田职工医院,陕西西安710201 [2]美康生物科技股份有限公司,浙江宁波315000
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2018年第10期184-185,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的探究多途径综合护理干预在脑卒中偏瘫患者中的临床效果。方法将于我院就诊的126例脑卒中偏瘫患者随机分为对照组和观察组,各63例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用多途径综合护理干预,比较两组临床效果。结果护理后,两组左室高电压均降低,FBG均升高,且观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。护理后,两组Barthel指数、Fugl-Meyer评分、SF-36评分、HAMA评分均改善,观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组护理满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论多途径综合护理干预有利于改善脑卒中偏瘫患者的上肢运动能力及日常生活活动能力,提高患者满意度。Objective To explore the effect of multi-way comprehensive nursing intervention in hemiplegia patients after stroke.Methods A total of 126 patients with hemiplegia after stroke admitted in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 63 cases in each group.The control group received routine nursing,the observation group was given multi-way comprehensive nursing intervention.The clinical effects between the two groups were compared.Results After nursing,the left ventricular high voltage and FBG in both groups improved,and those in the observation group were better than the control group(P<0.05).After nursing,the Barthel index,Fugl-Meyer scores,SF-36 scores and HAMA scores in both groups improved,and those in the observation group were better than the control group(P<0.05).The nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Multi-way comprehensive nursing intervention is helpful to improve the ability of upper extremity movement and activities of daily living in hemiplegia patients after stroke,and improve patients'satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7