民法总则与商事立法:共识、问题及选项——以商事代理为例  

General Rules of Civil Law and Commercial Legislation: Consensus,Problems and Options,Taking Business Agency as An Example

作　　者：郑泰安[1] 钟凯[1] ZHENG Tai-An;ZHONG Kai(Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences,Chengdu 610071,China)

机构地区：[1]四川省社会科学院,四川成都610071

出　　处：《现代法学》2018年第2期75-89,共15页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：在民法典编纂背景下,商法体系化及其规范实现适当的立法表达,已成为学界共识。《民法总则》所包含的直接或间接商法规范即为民法商法化之最新例证。但总体来看,包括职务代理规则在内的有关规范群缺失,表明民法总则的商法品格明显不足。在民法典之外制定《商事通则》,是接续职务代理等商事立法安排相对合理的选择。以商事代理规则设置为例,《商事通则》应摒弃法典化的统率模式,宜采以问题为导向、有限体系化的"剩余法"模式。In the context of the codification of China’s Civil Code,it has been an academic consensus to make commercial legalization systematic and normative and implement its proper legislative expression.Many direct and indirect provisions of commercial law in General Rules of Civil Law are new evidences that civil law has been turned into commercial law.However,generally,the absence of related terms including agency in duty reveals that General Rules of Civil Law is currently lack of commercial law’s characters.Besides Civil Code,making General Rules of Commerce is a relatively reasonable choice for commercial legislative arrangements such as terms of agency in duty.Taking business agency as an example,legislators should adopt problem-oriented and limited systematic pattern of“residual law”instead of unified pattern of codification.

关 键 词：民法总则 商事通则 职务代理 商事代理 

分 类 号：DF51[政治法律—民商法学]