检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李冰沁[1] 孙洁[1] 李俊伟[1] LI Bing-qin;SUN Jie;LI Jun-wei(ICU,Yunnan Second People’s Hospital,Kunming,Yunnan Province,650021 China)
机构地区:[1]云南省第二人民医院重症医学科,云南昆明650021
出 处:《中外医疗》2018年第1期93-94,97,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的观察与探究快速维护循环与重建呼吸在重症胸外伤患者救治中的效果。方法该文纳入研究和分析的资料为方便选取2014年3月—2017年3月该院收治的60例重症胸外伤患者,分组处理采用随机数字表法,1组入组患者有30例,常规救治方式用于对照组,对观察组患者在对照组的基础上给予快速维护循环与重建呼吸,对比并分析两组患者的效果。结果观察组患者的治疗总有效率(93.33%)与对照组患者(66.67%)相对比,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组患者治疗之后的RR、HR、PaO_2与对照组患者相对比,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在重症胸外伤患者的救治中应用快速维护循环与重建呼吸的效果较好。Objective This paper tries to observe and explore the effects of rapid maintenance cycle and reconstruction of breathing in patients with severe chest trauma.Methods This article included the research and analysis of data was from March 2014 to March 2017 were convenient selected in this hospital of 60 cases of severe chest trauma patients,using a random number table method to divide groups,group A with 30 cases with the conventional treatment as the control group,the observation group patients based on the control group added the rapid maintenance cycle and reconstruction of respiration,the effects of two groups of patients were compared and analyzed.Results The total effective rate(93.33%)in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(66.67%)(P<0.05).The RR,HR and PaO2 in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,the differences between the two groups were significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of rapid maintenance cycle and reconstruction breathing in the treatment of patients with severe chest trauma is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4