一般条款的裁判思维与方法——以广告过滤行为的正当性判断为例  

The Judicial Thinking and Methodology of General Clause: From the Perspective of judging the Legitimacy of Advertisement Filtering

作　　者：谢晓尧 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2018年第4期39-57,共19页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：一般条款是法律原则的特殊形态,司法适用中有其独特的裁判思维和技术方法。不同的当事人需要提取支持其利益诉求的规范命题(次级原则),法官要在相互冲突的法律命题中寻找个案规范。一般条款的要义是权衡和妥协,隐含着适度性的比例要求。广告过滤行为的正当性判断,要摒弃"全有全无"的规则性思维,在个案事实中去寻求答案。As a special pattern of legal principle,general clause has its unique judicial thinking and methodology in application.To support their claims,different parties extract normative propositions(secondary principles)from general clauses,and judges must find adjudication norm for the case at hand among conflicting normative propositions.The key to general clause is balancing and compromising,which imply the proportionate requirement of suitability.To judge the legitimacy of advertisement filtering,the extreme normative thought of‘all or nothing’should be abandoned,and the answer should be found case by case.

关 键 词：一般条款 司法适用 裁判思维与方法 广告过滤行为 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]