检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪常存 HONG Chang-cun(Department of Radiology,the Second People's Hospital of Heze,Heze 274003,Shandong Province,China)
机构地区:[1]山东省菏泽市第二人民医院放射科,山东菏泽274003
出 处:《中国CT和MRI杂志》2018年第2期111-113,共3页Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
摘 要:目的探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)对后踝、后pilon骨折的鉴别诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2015年1月-2017年5月收治的100例胫骨远端后侧骨折(包括后踝骨折38例、后pilon骨折62例)患者CT影像学资料。结果后踝骨折β角、FAR1、FAR2分别为(74.28±12.00)°、(6.81±3.29)%、(15.08±5.13)%,比后plion骨折的(79.42±10.83)°、(23.79±12.34)%、(28.27±10.64)%均显著低(P<0.05);Ⅰ型后踝骨折FAR1、FAR2均显著大于Ⅱ型(P<0.05);Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型FAR1均显著大于Ⅰ型(P<0.05),而Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同分型后plion骨折FAR2比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论后plion骨折相比后踝骨折矢状面上与地面垂直相关度更大,横切面、矢状面面积均显著大,且踝关节脱位发生风险显著大。Objective To investigate the value of multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT)in the differential diagnosis of posterior malleolus and posterior Pilon fractures.Methods CT imaging data of 100 cases of patients with distal posterior tibial fractures(including 38 cases of posterior malleolus fractures and 62 cases of posterior Pilon fractures)who were treated from January 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Results Theβangle,FAR1 and FAR2 of posterior malleolus fractures were significantly smaller or lower than those of Pilon fractures[(74.28±12.00)degrees,(6.81±3.29)%,(15.08±5.13)%vs(79.42±10.83)degrees,(23.79±12.34)%,(28.27±10.64)%](P<0.05).The FAR1 and FAR2 of type I posterior malleolus fractures were significantly higher than those of type II(P<0.05).FAR1 of type II and type III were significantly larger than that of type I(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between type II and type III(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in FAR2 between different types of posterior Pilon fractures(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the posterior malleolus fractures,the vertical correlation between sagittal plane and ground surface of posterior Pilon fractures is more obvious,the transverse and sagittal areas are significantly larger,and the risk of ankle joint dislocation is significantly higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222