检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雯 李伟超[1,2] 葛玉龙[1,2,3] LI Wen;LI Wei-chao;GE Yu-long(National Time Service Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi’an 710600,China;Key Laboratory of Precise Positioning and Timing Technology,National Time Service Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi’an 710600,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院国家授时中心,西安710600 [2]中国科学院精密导航定位与定时技术重点研究室,西安710600 [3]中国科学院大学,北京100049
出 处:《时间频率学报》2018年第1期9-16,共8页Journal of Time and Frequency
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41604026)
摘 要:基于北斗卫星导航载波相位共视(BDS CP(CV))时间传递模型,使用IGS多GNSS试验先导项目(MGEX)提供的精密轨道和钟差产品,研究分析GEO,IGSO和MEO 3种北斗在轨卫星进行时间传递的不确定度。实验结果表明:相对于双向卫星比对结果和光纤比对结果,基于IGSO载波相位时间传递结果的标准差较好,相对于双向卫星比对结果,西安—长春观测数据比对结果的标准差中IGSO较好,可以达到0.39 ns;相对于光纤比对结果,西安—临潼观测数据比对结果的标准差中IGSO较好,可以达到0.18 ns;基于GEO和IGSO的载波相位时间传递结果的稳定度比基于MEO的较好。Based on the BDS CP(CV)(carrier phase common-view)time transfer model and the precise orbit and clock products provided by the MGEX(multi-GNSS experiment),the uncertainty of time transfer of GEO,IGSO and MEO are presented in this paper.Experimental results show that the standard deviation of BDS CP(CV)time transfer of IGSO is better than that of GEO and MEO compared with the results of two-way satellites time transfer and fiber link time transfer.The BDS CP(CV)standard deviation of IGSO is 0.39 ns between Xi’an and Changchun compared with the results of two-way satellites time transfer,and the standard deviation of IGSO is 0.18 ns between Xi’an and Lintong compared with the results of fiber link time transfer.The stability of GEO and IGSO using carrier phase time transfer are better than MEO compared with the results of two-way satellites time transfer and fiber link time transfer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.221.222