中美过电流火灾物证鉴定技术研究综述  

Overview on the identification technology of overcurrent in China and America

作　　者：司永轩 刘玲[1] 金南江 李阳[1] SI Yong-xuan;LIU Ling;JIN Nan-jiang;LI Yang(The Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces Academy,Hebei Langfang 065000,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民武装警察部队学院,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《消防科学与技术》2018年第3期419-422,共4页Fire Science and Technology

基　　金：公安部技术研究计划项目(2015JSYJC25);2017中国消防协会科学技术年会"青年消防学者论坛"交流论文

摘　　要：调查对比中美两国过电流故障相关标准和研究现状。研究表明,中美两国对于过电流故障研究均较为深入系统,有一定的共同处,但也存在侧重点的差异,尤其是对过电流痕迹的归类方法存在较大差异。通过归纳总结,找到美国此研究领域中,值得我国过电流研究借鉴的内容,为火灾调查中更好地认定过电流故障及相关痕迹物证提供了新思路。The related standards and research situation of overcur-rent in China and America was investigated and compared.Study showed that,Chinese and Americanresearch areboth thorough and systematical;there are something in common,but different empha-sis exists;especially,there are big differences in classification meth-od for overcurrent trace.Through summarizing,theAmerican re-search contents worthy of reference for Chinese investigators were found,to provide a new idea for investigating overcurrent and rela-tive evidence in real fire investigation.

关 键 词：火灾调查 物证鉴定 火灾痕迹 过电流 

分 类 号：X928.7[环境科学与工程—安全科学] TU998.12[建筑科学—市政工程]