当代史研究的价值与四种历史判断的方法  

On the Value of Contemporary Chinese History Studies and the Four Methods of Historical Judgement

作　　者：李良玉 Li Liangyu(School of History,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学历史学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第1期1-9,92,共10页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：1949年以来的中国当代史,由于和当代人事乃至政治的纠葛,具有敏感性高、下笔难、是非多的特点。关于"张凯帆事件",《曾希圣传》的三个文本和《张凯帆回忆录》,在互文的角度上更能看出立传的不易。判断是一种思想方法。史学研究中的判断就是历史判断,具体体现为事实判断、情感判断、价值判断、逻辑判断四种学术路径。灵活运用这些方法,有益于提升当代史研究的学术水平。The contemporary Chinese history that begins at 1949 features high sensitivity,descriptive hardship and much controversy because of its involvement with contemporary people and events.Take Zhang Kaifan Incident as an example.It is recounted differently in the 3 versions of Biography of Zeng Xisheng and Zhang Kaifans Memoir,showing the difficulty of writing biographies from the intertextual angle.Making judgments is a way of thinking,and making judgments in historical studies is making historical judgments,which can be divided into making judgments of fact,emotion,value and logic.A skillful use of these four methods will facilitate the advance of the studies of contemporary Chinese history.

关 键 词：中国当代史 张凯帆事件 四种历史判断 史学方法论 

分 类 号：K27[历史地理—历史学]