检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张荣刚[1] ZHANG Rong-gang(School of Liberal Arts,Guizhou Education University,Guiyang,Guizhou,550018)
出 处:《贵州师范学院学报》2018年第2期13-17,共5页Journal of Guizhou Education University
基 金:2014年贵州师范学院博士项目"明代取士经义文体流变研究"(编号14BS001);2016年国家社会科学规划基金资助项目"明代‘八股’时文与古文关系研究"(编号16BZW100)
摘 要:经义试士始于宋代,到了明代则成了科举取士中最重要的文体,而在由宋到明的过程中其体式结构发生了很大的变化,尤其是明初取士经义,对明清八股文的形成有着直接的影响。明初取士之法损益宋元旧制,而取士经义体式也在探索中发展。结合明初科举取士程式的制定,通过对取士经义文体结构前后变化的分析,对明初经义体式特征有着更深刻的认识,同时对八股文的形成也会有着新的认知和理解。The Confucian classics argumentation for selecting talents,dating back to the Song Dynasty,became the most important examination style in the Ming dynasty.Great changes took place in its style format during the period from Song dynasty to the Ming dynasty.Especially in early Ming Dynasty,the structural format of the Confucian Classics Argumentation has a direct impact on the eight-part essay in Ming and Qing dynasties.The system of selecting talents in early Ming dynasty was established by revising the systems of the Song and Yuan dynasties,while the structure of Confucian Classics Argumentation was also developed in exploration.Based on the formation of the system for selecting talents in the imperial exam in the Ming dynasty,this paper analyzes the diachronic changes in the Confucian Classics Argumentation,which will help us better understand the Confucian classics argumentation in early Ming dynasty,and will shed a light on the form of eight-part essay.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28