国际体育仲裁中“已决之诉”原则的适用  

Principle of “Res Judicata” Applied to International Sports Arbitration

作　　者：熊瑛子[1] XIONG Yingzi(School of P.E.,Soochow University,Suzhou 215021,China)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学体育学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2018年第4期51-58,共8页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2016SJB890012)

摘　　要：已决之诉系瑞士法律明列可以撤销仲裁裁决的理由。瑞士联邦最高法院的司法实践表明:应当充分重视已决之诉原则,这一原则在适用中需要厘清同一争议、同一当事人和同一标的三个要素。同一争议的界定中,应当摒弃三要素标准,采实质同一标准。同一当事人和同一标的的界定中,应采广义原则,体育领域中利害关系第三人应涵括在同一当事人的范畴,针对同一争议的两份决议应整体看待。先前法院有无管辖权是判断已决之诉原则的重要因素,法律适用错误不得作为已决之诉原则之抗辩理由。Res judicata is one of the reasons of Swiss law that can revoke the arbitration awards.The practice of the Swiss Federal Tribunal should pay more attentionto the principle of res judicata.In the application of the principle of res judicata,it should clarify three concepts which include the same disputes,same parties and same objects.In the definition of identity of claims,it should get rid of the theory of three elements,but standard of essence of the same.In the definition of identity of parties and identity of objects,it should adopt a broad sense,and the third party of interest should be included in the identity of parties in the sports field.It also should treat two related decisions as one.jurisdiction of the court is the key fact to the principle of res judicata.Mistakes in application of law deems not to be justification for defense of deny of res judicata.

关 键 词：仲裁 体育仲裁 仲裁裁决 已决之诉 自裁管辖权 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]