利用“新生关键词”测度我国图书馆学“生长度”(2000-2015)  

A Revisit to the “Rate of Growth” of Chinese Library Science(2000-2015):An Analysis Based on Emerging Keywords

作　　者：王申罡 张歌[2] WANG Shengang;ZHANG Ge

机构地区：[1]美国威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校信息学院 [2]北京大学信息管理系

出　　处：《图书馆论坛》2018年第5期31-43,共13页Library Tribune

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目"中国图书馆学史"(项目编号:13&ZD153)研究成果

摘　　要：作为对我国图书馆学知识增长情况的阶段性讨论,文章借用并修正"生长度"概念,以2000-2015年间发表在《中国图书馆学报》等五种期刊的15173篇图书馆学文献的关键词为基础,通过学术数据库回溯和定位特定语词在我国图书馆学研究中的最早文献出处或最早出现年份,确定"新生关键词"集合。研究发现:从"新生关键词"数量变化看,我国图书馆学学科知识有所增长,但近年增速减缓;我国图书馆学研究具有很强的开放性,受国外和其他学科的研究影响较大,而本土学者具有原创性的概念研究较少,呈现出鲜明的"外在拉力为主,内在推力不足"的学科发展驱动力特点。Based on the modified concept“rate of growth,”this study collects and analyzes 15,173 library science-related journal articles and corresponding keywords in five core journals including Journal of Library Science in China between 2000 and 2015.The set of“emerging keyword”of China’s library science is determined by tracing the earliest years when specific words were first used as keywords or appeared in titles or abstracts in journal articles.In addition,the question of driving force is answered from two aspects,disciplines and areas where those emerging keywords originate.Through measurements and analysis,it comes to following conclusions:since 2000,the concepts and terms of Chinese library science have been largely enriched,which to some extent can be seen as evidence of knowledge increment,while the growth rate of knowledge is slowing down in recent years.In terms of driving force,the findings indicate that Chinese library science is much more significantly influenced by foreign and other disciplinary studies than native ones conducted by Chinese scholars.

关 键 词：新生关键词 学科生长度 知识增长 图书馆学 

分 类 号：G250[文化科学—图书馆学]