检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申卫红[1] 朱岚[1] SHEN Wei-hong;ZHU Lan(The Department of Laboratory Medicine,The Third People's Hospital of Wuxi,Jiangsu Wuxi 214041,China)
机构地区:[1]无锡市第三人民医院检验科,江苏无锡214041
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2017年第91期17823-17824,17839,共3页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的探讨体液污染对于CA19-9检测结果的影响及临床意义。方法选取在本院消化科住院的28名消化道肿瘤患者,分为以下四组:标准处理分析组(A)、不戴口罩分析组(B)、不戴手套分析组(C)和口罩、手套均不戴分析组(D)。各实验组均采用Luminex 200流式荧光分析仪检测血清CA19-9含量,然后对结果进行统计分析。结果与标准处理分析组(A)相比,其它三种不同处理分析实验组(B、C和D组)实验结果均显示不同程度增高的趋势,尤其以D组增高趋势最为明显。而且统计学分析表明,B、C、D组与A组相比,实验结果均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论唾液、汗液双重体液污染对CA19-9检测结果影响显著高于唾液或汗液单一体液污染。Objective To investigate the influence and clinical significance of humoral pollution on the results of CA19-9 detection.Methods Select 28 patients with digestive tract cancer hospitalized in the Department of digestion in our hospital,the following four groups were divided into four groups:standard treatment analysis group(A),no mask analysis group(B),glove analysis group(C),masks and gloves without analysis group.The content of serum CA19-9 was detected by Luminex 200 flow fluorescence analyzer in all the experimental groups,and then the results were statistically analyzed.(D).Result Compared with the standard treatment and Analysis Group(A),the other three different processing analysis groups(B,C and D)showed different degrees of increasing trend,especially in the D group.The statistical analysis showed that the results of B,C and D were statistically significant compared with group A(P<0.05).Conclusion The influence of saliva and sweat double body fluid pollution on the results of CA19-9 detection was significantly higher than that of saliva or sweat single body fluid pollution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.2.199