疤痕子宫再次妊娠二次剖宫产与非疤痕子宫剖宫产的对比评价  

Comparative evaluation of cesarean section with second cesarean section and non-cadaveric uterus in scar pregnancy again

作　　者：韩明 HAN Ming(Taizhou third people's hospital of gynecology and obstetrics,jiangsu taizhou 225321,China)

机构地区：[1]泰州市第三人民医院妇产科,江苏泰州225321

出　　处：《临床医药文献电子杂志》2017年第98期19224-19225,19227,共3页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature

摘　　要：目的比较分析疤痕子宫再次妊娠二次剖宫产与非疤痕子宫剖宫产的恢复情况。方法选取我院2015年1月~2017年2月收治的疤痕子宫再次妊娠二次剖宫产产妇64例作为观察组,选择64例非疤痕子宫剖宫产产妇作为对照组,均于,记录两组手术指标和康复指标,并进行比较。结果与对照组相比,观察组子宫及胎盘危险情况发生率更高,且手术指标、术后康复指标均明显较差,差异显著,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论疤痕子宫再次妊娠二次剖宫产产妇危险性较高,其与非疤痕子宫剖宫产产妇相比,术中、术后出血量均更多,需加强观察,做好防护措施,预防危险事件的发生。Objective To comparatively analyze the recovery of second cesarean section and second cesarean section in non-scarred uterus after scar pregnancy.Methods Sixty-four cases of secondary uterine cesarean scar pregnancy were selected as the observation group.Sixty-four non-uterine cesarean section women were selected as the control group.All patients were treated from January 2015 to February 2017,Indicators and rehabilitation indicators,and compared.Results Compared with the control group,the incidence of uterine and placenta in observation group was higher,and the indexes of operation and postoperative rehabilitation were significantly worse,with significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion The second cesarean section in uterus with scar pregnancy is more dangerous than the second cesarean section.Compared with non-scarring uterine cesarean delivery women,both intraoperative and postoperative bleeding are more serious.It is necessary to strengthen the observation and preventative measures The occurrence of a dangerous event.

关 键 词：疤痕子宫 非疤痕子宫 再次妊娠 剖宫产 

分 类 号：R714[医药卫生—妇产科学]