置县存废下的博弈与妥协——以清代以来魏县、大名、元城三县行政关系为例  

Gaming and Compromises Under the Background of County Preservation and Abolishment——A Case Study of the Administrative Relations between the Three Counties of Wei,Daming,and Yuancheng Since Qing Dynasty

作　　者：李诚 Li Cheng

机构地区：[1]北京市社会科学院历史所

出　　处：《中国地方志》2018年第2期82-89,126,127,共9页China Local Records

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"清史地图集"(项目编号:12&ZD146)阶段性成果

摘　　要：乾隆二十二年(1757),漳河水患淹没了河北平原南部魏县与大名县治。经直隶总督方观承查勘,清廷最终将魏县并入大名、元城两县。原本三县中地域最广的魏县被拆分,为魏县在民国3年(1914)与20年的两次复县运动留下了伏笔。然而两次复县运动的结果却总是半途而废。分析魏县及元城被废原因及复县诉求,可知在不同政治背景下,不同利益阶层围绕三县行政关系的利益博弈与妥协,这同时也是国家决策在地方行政中的具体体现。In the 22nd year of the Reign of Qianlong(1757),Zhang River flooded the county seats of Wei County and Daming County in the southern part of Hebei Plain.After investigation by Zhili Viceroy Fang Guancheng,the Qing court decided to merge Wei County with Daming County and Yuancheng County.The division of Wei County,the largest among the three counties in terms of territory,left a hint foreshadowing the two county restoration movements in the third year(1914)and 20th year(1931)of the Republic of China period.Yet both the results of the two county restoration movements were given up halfway.Through analysis of the reasons for the abolishment of Wei County and Yuancheng County and appeals to have them restored,we can learn about the gaming and compromises surrounding the administrative relations of the three counties under different political backgrounds by different classes of interests,which were also the specific reflections of national decision-making on local administration.

关 键 词：魏县 大名 元城 行政关系 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]