某钢筋桁架楼承板与压型钢板组合楼板经济技术比较与分析  

ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGY FOR REINFOCED TRUSS FLOOR BOARDS AND PRESSED STEEL PLATE COMBINATION FLOOR

作　　者：刘军 高晨星 LIU Jun;GAO Chenxing(Xinjiang Architectural Design Institute,Urumqi 830002,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆维吾尔自治区建筑设计研究院,乌鲁木齐830002

出　　处：《低温建筑技术》2018年第6期83-86,共4页Low Temperature Architecture Technology

摘　　要：对乌鲁木齐绿地中心三期超高层项目楼板,采用开口型、闭口型压型钢板楼承板与钢筋桁架楼承板进行了配筋。对建筑使用效果、受力、防火、防腐等性能及材料造价、施工速度、施工造价进行了对比,综合评定,最终本项目推荐采用钢筋桁架楼承板。The reinforced calculation of truss deck concrete,closed and opend profiled sheetingconcrete composite floor slab for Green-Land business center floor slab in Urumchi was completed.The comparative analysis of architectural effect,mechanical behavior,fireproof&anticorrosion performance,construction cost,construction speed between different type floors was finished.The result showed that the truss deck concrete floor slab was more suitable for this project.

关 键 词：钢筋桁架楼承板 开口型、闭口型压型钢板楼承板 造价 防火、防腐性能 

分 类 号：TU392.4[建筑科学—结构工程]