检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘司墨 LIU Si-mo(College for Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《石家庄学院学报》2018年第4期116-120,共5页Journal of Shijiazhuang University
摘 要:运输毒品罪与走私、贩卖、制造毒品罪共同作为选择性罪名置于《中华人民共和国刑法》第347条之中,并同时适用同一法定刑。实务界、理论界对运输毒品罪的这一规定存在众多分歧,其中最主要的争议是运输毒品罪的死刑是否应当废止。当前,运输毒品罪的死刑限制论更加具备国情基础。在国家严惩毒品犯罪以及运输毒品罪高案发率的背景下,司法适用过程中应当谨遵刑法谦抑性原则,通过罪质限定、罪责限定两种方式严格限制本罪的死刑适用,进一步为立法逐步废止死刑创造条件。As selective crime,the crime of transporting drugs is in Article 347 of the Criminal Law as well as the crimes of selling,trafficking,and drug-making are jointly included,both applying the same legal punishment.There are many disagreements in this provision of the crime of transporting drugs between the practice and the theoretical circles.The most important one is whether the death penalty for the transport of drugs should be abolished.At present,the limitation of death penalty for the crime of transporting drugs has more national conditions.In the context of the state's severe punishment for the high crime rate of drug crimes and drug trafficking,the principle of modesty of criminal law should be followed in the judicial application process.The application of the death penalty to this crime should be limited by restricting the quality of crimes and limiting the culpability strictly to create conditions for the gradual abolition of the death penalty further.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.70.102