检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Edwin K.Yager
机构地区:[1]University of California at San Diego,La Jolla,CA,USA
出 处:《Psychology Research》2018年第6期231-250,共20页心理学研究:英文版
摘 要:This study is a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of four psychotherapeutic treatment modalities:Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy(CBT),Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing(EMDR),Dialectical Behavior Therapy(DBT),and Hypnotic methods(HYP).The aim of this study was to determine the independent effectiveness of the four treatment modalities by reviewing the available literature.A total of 26,724 studies were identified by ProQuest search and screened to eliminate studies that did not permit computation of the success rates of their use.Of that total,648 studies included objective data in some form,with 207 studies qualifying for inclusion in the analysis.The“Success Rate”measure was used as the standard of measurement,and was obtained by comparing the pre-treatment scores with post-treatment scores as published in the qualifying studies.Analysis revealed the most effective treatment modality to be EMDR,with a success rate of 49.4%.CBTwas the second most effective at 40.5%,and the success rates of Hypnosis and DBT were 39.2%and 22.4%respectively.The clinical question in therapy should probably be,“How effective can I expect this method of treatment to be?”The findings of this study reveal CBT to be less effective than EMDR and equally effective as Hypnosis;and with DBT being significantly less effective,we are left with the implication that we must expand what we know.
关 键 词:CBT EMDR DBT HYPNOSIS EFFECTIVENESS efficacy SUCCESS rate
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.206.232