有创动脉测压指导下两种心肺复苏方式对近期预后的影响  

Effects of two kinds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation modes by the invasive arterial pressure measurement on the short-term prognosis

作　　者：江倩华 冯锡烜 刘书雁 Jiang Qianhua;Feng Xixuan;Liu Shuyan(Department of Emergency,Shunde Hospital of Nanfang Medical University(Guangdong Foshan)528300)

机构地区：[1]南方医学大学顺德医院急诊科,广东佛山528300

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2018年第20期47-47,49,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

基　　金：佛山市科学技术局(2015AB002283)~~

摘　　要：目的:研究两种心肺复苏方式对心搏骤停近期预后的影响。方法:收治心搏骤停患者28例,分为对照组(13例)、观察组(15例),比较两组复苏时平均动脉压(MAP)水平及30 min、24 h复苏成功率。结果:观察组复苏时MAP明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组自主循环恢复(ROSC)持续>30 min和ROSC持续>24 h比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:使用心肺复苏仪不能改善心搏骤停患者的近期预后。Objective:To research the effect of two kinds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation modes on the short-term prognosis of cardiac arrest.Methods:28 cases of patients with cardiac arrest were divided into the control group(13 cases)and the observation group(15 cases),the recovery of average arterial pressure(MAP),the successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)of 30 min and 24 h were compared in the two groups.Results:The recovery of MAP in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference of the recovery of autonomic circulation(ROSC)>30 min and ROSC>24 h between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:CPR could not improve the short-term prognosis of patients with cardiac arrest.

关 键 词：心搏骤停 心肺复苏 平均动脉压 自主循环恢复 

分 类 号：R459.7[医药卫生—急诊医学]