检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:焦长庚 戴健[2] JIAO Chang-geng;DAI Jian(School of Economics and Management,Shanghai University of Sport,Shanghai 200438,China;College of Office,Shanghai University of Sport,Shanghai 200438,China)
机构地区:[1]上海体育学院经济管理学院,上海200438 [2]上海体育学院学院办公室,上海200438
出 处:《体育学刊》2018年第4期35-41,共7页Journal of Physical Education
基 金:2016年国家体育总局哲学社会科学一般研究项目(2270SS16007)
摘 要:针对当前我国部分地方政府将PPP模式引入公共体育服务中的初级阶段,探索政府部门与私营部门之间合作功能定位模糊等问题,并分析问题产生的诱导因素及影响,建立双方的监管博弈模型,将政府部门和私营部门的权责进行划分。据此提出公共体育服务PPP模式下双方合作的发展建议:完善保障政府部门与私营部门之间利益平衡的法律系统;构造政府部门与私营部门项目间深度融合的协作框架;树立政府部门与私营部门之间公平合理的风险分担机制;创建规范有效的项目监督管理标准与绩效评价体系。Aiming at that nowadays some local governments in China introduce the PPP mode into the initial stage in public sports service,the authors probed into problems such as function orientation ambiguity in the cooperation between government departments and private departments,analyzed the induction factors and effects of problem occurrence,established a both parties supervision and gaming model,divided the power and responsibilities of government departments and private departments,and accordingly put forward the following proposals for the development of cooperation between both parties under the PPP mode of public sports service:perfect the legal system that ensures the interest balance between government departments and private departments;build a framework of deeply fused cooperation between government department and private department projects;set up a mechanism of fair and reasonable risk sharing between government departments and private departments;establish a standard and effective project supervision and management standard and performance evaluation system.
关 键 词:公共体育服务 PPP模式 政府部门 私营部门 功能定位 权责划分
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30